Gallery Question
 

CanI post some non-anime PAL fanart in the gallery?

PAL? also by non-anime I assume you mean western style art, not photos?

PAL being work from palcomix.com

And by non-anime, I mean Western comic books, cartoons, and TV (For example X-Men, Star Trek, etc.)

ah got ya ;) palcomix works - as long as its spanking is fine

Actually, this one puzzles me. Why? Not because I've got any 3D art I'm hankering to upload, but out of general curiosity... The other rules make perfect sense to me, but this one just seems odd. Obviously there are issues if the image is too realistic, but we already have rules for that. More to the point, we already have art like that in the gallery. It just strikes me as a curious choice, and I was wondering what the thinking there is.

I think this mostly refers to 3D as in "as realistic as possible" as opposed to 3D as in "What El Manto did once".

what word I can use for the over one knee position?

Yeah, it's too realistic. Word from the top, quite fairly, no 3D of any kind. Nothing realistic. Don't forget, they count as Psudeophotos' (IE, Real Pictures) so even pictures of adults are iffy under law.


Yup, they're legalily defined under UK law as 'real.'


I've just used "OTK" for that. It's still over a knee, even if it isn't a plural. It depends on how the spankee is posted - you might want to make it "Fours" instead.

If it's going to be no 3d art regardless of whether it looks realistic in the slightest, the rules should be amended to reflect that and it should be applied fairly - as pointed out, there is already 3d art in the gallery from before this rule was apparently decided on.

I've already noticed you removing recently posted 3d art that was not even remotely realistic, so at least it's good to see this being clarified on the site.

What about 3D photos from a video game like Bloody Roar 3? I was gonna upload them, but it didn't look realistic. I think it's all right.