Quote:
What I am completely confused about now that this site was very much described as a porn site is why, if we know that for 90% of the people here get excited about spanking, we allow children being portrayed in pictures then? In a very logical way we're then allowing porn including minors, given how it's most people's fetish.
Shouldn't we go for only adults in pics?
|
Way to dismiss a very large section of the spanking enthusiasts whose enjoyment stems from either childhood memories, ageplay or simply find a suitable venue for the power exchange component of their fantasy on a child/warden scenario. Way, also, to equate fantasies with possible actual acts. Not to mention that pointing fingers at other members as part of your argumentation does not exactly help to make a strong case.
A large portion of the success of this site, and of the strong sense of community it generates, is that it allows people to come out in the open and enjoy their fantasies, and I stress, FANTASIES, without being judged (As far as I know, our admins have done a sterling job of banning people who overstepped that boundary, so nothing to complain). Making a chasm like the one you suggest with that sentence would pretty much undo all the work that went into creating that atmosphere in one go, and I think that´s not what this site is about.
I can understand your concern and its reasons, and I applaud you for having the strength of your convictions and bringing it up in a civilized way, and with way less drama than others have done, but I think you´re way off key here, and that sticking to the rule of "If it complies with the spirit of the site and doesn´t get us in trouble, it´s kosher" would be a much more productive approach.