Which spanking position is the most humiliating?

[DutsoMan]

I think of a lot of people would say "legs up", and that's true, but let's put our thinking caps on and try to CREATE a new even MORE embarrassing position. One that doesn't require special "furniture" and can be used on any surface (barring lava or the vacuum of space, of course).
Starting off with legs up, because it's both humiliating and allows for a great deal of control on the top's part, let's spread the legs for an increase in genital exposure (one of the main reasons the original legs up was so embarrassing in the first place). Without the use of a spreader bar, or a second spanker to hold the legs, it makes sense to make the spankee hold their own legs by grabbing behind the knees. Now, without the hands on the ground to keep their legs high in the air, they will have to lean backwards and onto their upper back.
However, this is where even further control can be given to the spanker. Have the spankee cross their arms as they grab under their knees. The spanker may then grab the cross formed by the arms and pull the spankee backwards with their non-spanking hand. Ideally, this will result in the feet of the spankee positioned around their ears. I would recommend a strap or flexible paddle, probably at a 45 degree angle swing.

Also, due to the inflexibility of most underwear preventing complete spreading of the legs. There by, the best level of exposure for this position would be either underwear removed or totally nude.

Another option would be to have the spankee squat at the spanker's waist level (standing on a desk, or next to a seated spanker). Then, with legs fully contracted, have them roll backwards onto their upper shoulders and grab under their feet. The same cross armed principle from the previous position could be used, the arms could be kept uncrossed and the thigh could be held by the spanker instead. This variation could be used at the gym or during a sports practice, as it combines physical conditioning with proper chastisement.

Any other ideas?

[QueenTutankhamun]

I love that- creative and practical! And yes, it could be combined with excercise eg forward/backwards rolls.

[Lucky Vassall]

Certainly the diaper position is humiliating, but I think elipsis39 has pointed out the most humiliating (as well as vulnerable) position. This is almost certainly because, if one cannot touch the floor with either hands or feet, one is once more back in the position of a very small child. Since most remembered spankings are after one is large enough to reach the floor, at least with either hands or feet if not both, we forget the feeling of a total loss of control that this "free fall" position brings. Try it and you'll see what I mean!

[atka]

I say diaper position in front of others would be humiliating, eye contact and having your private in view.

[ipa213]

Originally Posted by Little Sayuri

Hmmmm....(hi again^^) I think the "diaper position" is humiliating too...and maybe if the spankee must stay with his/her hands on his/her feets, but these are just good positions for implements...

Greetings

L.S.

Diaper position does not float my boat in my opinion. Here are my issues with the diaper position from the bottom's perspective.

1. It is humiliating and you have no frontal modesty. Your genitalia will be exposed in a not so nice way.

2. You can see when the hits are coming. Any other position you can have your view looking away from the implement or hand.

From the top's perspective, I'm not a fan of the diaper position because the bottom is never really relaxed and I don't really like the view of the butt from that position.

[thingywhat]

When spanking, the diaper position is an interesting position to hold someone in; I have rather lengthy arms so the obvious way to hold someone is wrapping one arm over their bent up legs and under their back... But if they really struggle, it's easy for them to escape.

Rather, if they struggle, I find it easier to lay them on one of my legs perpendicular to the direction I am facing, (Like OTK, except with the spankee face-up, and with one of my legs bent sideways.) and wrapping my arm around their legs near their feet and pushing them up, over, and down, forcing them into a "V" shape on my leg. That way they can't move from their position as I spank them until I decide it's over. Struggling backwards is easily blocked by angling my leg upwards, and every other way is blocked by default. I could also change how much the skin is stretched so the spanking hurts more or less depending on how much I pushed down on their legs. It can be quite a workout for the spanker, and quite a stretch for the spankee. I bet one could become flexible if they were spanked like that enough.

It is easy to hold the position as a spanker, but from the spankee's perspective it appears to be very difficult. So considering how difficult it appears to be, and how exposed the position is, it just makes things more humiliating for the spankee. Forcing them to think that if even, in such a difficult position they can't escape, what hope do they have?

The added effect of being able to increase the severity and discomfort simultaneously also probably makes it have the potential to be the most painful position.

These effects are something I never thought of when being spanked in the diaper position the first way mentioned above, but it became really apparent when I was in the second position. It is such a vulnerable position that seems like you should be able to escape really easily, but you are exposed completely and truly stuck. You are in a position where your spanker has complete control over you. And you are going to take everything they are going to give you, no matter how much you try to get away.

You are helpless.

[Arata]

I'd say diaper position.

[spankable_bottom]

for me, diaper position and all fours

[lonelyspankee]

Since spanking is a return to childhood it should be simple and direct and private starting on the clothing then the underwear then on the bare - the most humiliating factor would be constant scolding and conversation between the spanker and spankee during the spankee.

[Kobal]

Laying face down on a flat surface and reaching back and pulling your cheeks apart for a cleft bottomhole spanking