Quote:
Originally Posted by SSJ
I don't know, man. If I want to buy a porn magazine IRL, the shop clerk has to verify I'm an adult. Sounds reasonable to me.
|
A little late of a reply on my end, but one of the other concerns if this passes is that, as a CYA thing, ISPs may just outright start preventing access to adult or otherwise "questionable" websites regardless of age verification process in order to just make sure no minors find a way around the system and result in some ignorant and angry parent (or worse, government official) suing them.
Using VPNs is already kind of a grey area, and I can also imagine a world where ISPs in the US will just block any traffic detected going through a VPN as a blanket effort at preventing circumventing any policies out in place by this law.
A site that primarily gets traffic from the US suddenly losing a huge number of it's visitors because people don't want to just throw their increasingly compromised personal information out there? Suddenly the server costs stop being worth maintaining and these sites you might enjoy start shutting down.
And then, of course, what happens if more benign information and sites start getting restricted or banned by ISPs and government officials in the name of "protecting" kids? Man, that Wikipedia site sure has a lot of adult topics on it. Maybe they need to start being regulated or blocked. After all: how many of us spankos got to feed our interest at a young age looking up the word in a dictionary or fantasizing over scenes from old books, TV shows, and movies? (Just look at the number of animated scenes we have here for download from otherwise non-pornographic sources).
That's always been the dangerous thing about these various "internet safety bills" that come up: They make reasonable arguments as to why people should give up some of their rights that end up have massive long reaching consequences in the name of "but think of the children!"
EDIT: Just as a follow up thought, there are some... let's call them "extremely conservative" figures in high positions of political power and influence in the US who have expressly stated their intent to push for the full scale ban and criminalization of pornography, it's production, and it's distribution within the country should... let's call them their "candidate of choice" win the upcoming presidential election.
So the concerns expressed in this thread are not me and others making a slippery slope argument out of panic or speculation - there's a legitimate and active threat of this stuff coming to pass in the US
right now.