Want to get rid of the annoying adverts? The answer is simple. There are 4 levels of advertising on AnimeOTK:
Level 1: (Your Level, guests and members with 0-9 posts) has maximum advertising. Level 2: (A user with 10 or more posts who has been a member over two weeks) have vastly reduced advertising (including removal of the large full screen closable adverts) Level 3: (A member who has been registered over a month and has over 50 posts, or has a special account like "artist" or "writer" sees minimal advertising. Level 4: (VIP Donators) receive no advertising.
All donators of $10 or more will never see an advert on our site again!
The unfairness of it sometimes. It's funny how parents and authority figures don't want to act when someone bullies you with words, but the moment you retaliate, then all hell rains down.
So politically incorrect.
Don't you know it's supposed to be OK for girls to assault boys? Especially crotch kicks. Those are just funny. The more pain, the funnier it is! Unless the boy needs medical attention. Then CPS gets involved and it's not funny anymore. Anything less though, and that's all part of the feminist narrative. You may need to be cancelled.
Explanation. What I have depicted in this manga is the unreasonableness of an era when the old values were alive: girls were not allowed to be violent for any reason. I do not want to affirm that unreasonableness. Just as drawing a picture of corporal punishment does not mean affirmation of corporal punishment against real children. I myself experienced corporal punishment and was a victim of that era. But the direction of your opinion is correct. From now on I will try to write the context in the caption.
The boy was in no way 'assaulting' her. Or even bullying her. If someone thinks that responding to the most stupid , childlike 'insult' possible (sticking out one's tongue) with a freaking shot to the balls is some how 'justified' for 'bullying', or crap, 'self defense' then all I can say is they are a danger to society. Even if the boy 'started it' with the raspberry he's already been 'punished' far worse than a spanking even, so of course I don't feel sorry for the girl at all, and I hope even given her age she is given a spanking that means she can't sit for a day or two. Even though I don't like bullies (I was bullied for years by different people and sometimes groups of people and I only DREAM that they stuck to giving me raspberries) and I agree that modern schools are as likely to punish both (regardless of who started a physical fight) or worse, punish a person for actual self-defense, this particular level of violence was way over the top and should not be seen among such young kids anyway.
Everything checks out here to me, lol. Groin shot ain't a proportionate response to a blown raspberry, even if he is being a brat. Excessive responses, especially violent ones, are not suddenly virtuous and just, just because a girl's the one doing it. Imagine a boy pulling a groin kick on a girl over a taunt, even repeated taunts. Or a girl on another girl. Not like women are immune to it if you aim right, hell, probably less risk of permanent genital damage/mutilation, too!
He'd be in for twelve kinds of hell regardless, and rightly so. So should a girl. Boy probably won't taunt her after that, learned his lesson if in a horrendously disproportionate manner, and the girl got punished for said disproportionate response. Fair's fair.
@iwayuruyurushi Unlike what some people think, I don't believe anyone should be "canceled" for any reason. Because you draw something does not mean you endorse it. Maybe writing a few lines about the context and the artist's position on the subject can help, but you don't have to justify yourself.
Haters gonna hate. This site has a sizeable number o pictures of unjustified, unfair or excessive spanking, since some artists enjoy that narrative, and no one bats an eyelid.
Honestly, to everyone that gets upset over their real-life experience or the real life dimension of something they see here... we are genuinely sorry you had bad experiences similar to those seen here. But it's neither our fault, nor our problem, and the author needs not to justify or explain anything, as log as it's within the rules
iwayuruyurushi: to be clear and FWIW: my original comment was somewhat facetious, and the part about cancelling was entirely so. I believed that, on this site, that much would be apparent. I was mistaken. So: thank you for kindly sharing your artwork with us. I for one appreciate the effort. My comment was not really directed at you, but at the general tendency in our society to excuse or minimize misandrist violence directed at boys/men. Again: thank you for your contribution.
@spanko It's true that this is a place where people with niche proclivities are segregated, so there may be less need for justification than in a normal place. But injustice is injustice. And since I like to make that injustice the theme of my artwork, I felt it was important to leave some text to explain it to prevent misreading. Thanks for the follow-up.
@beastly It seems like I failed to see through the humor in your comment, so my bad really^^
@iwayuruyurushi I share your opinion about injustice ; I remember feeling mad at the woman for failing to see how unfair, to a certain degree, she had been to the girl. I was no stranger myself to being punished for retaliating against bullies in my childhood, so the theme of this artwork resonates with me. And I believe that explaining it can only bring a better understanding of it, but only as long as you don't feel compelled to do so.
Spanko: No worries. I often forget that there is no inflection in text and presume that readers will interpret the comment from the perspective with which it was written. That's on me.
